Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Supreme Court ERISA Case

On June 19th, the US Supreme Court ruled that the dual role of ERISA plan administrators that both determine whether an employee is eligible for benefits, and pay benefits out of their own pockets, creates a conflict of interest. Thus, a reviewing court should consider such conflict as a factor in determining whether a plan administrator has abused its discretion in denying benefits, and the significance of the factor will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case.

The case is Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, No. 06-923.

No comments: